mirror of
https://github.com/kjanat/livedash-node.git
synced 2026-01-16 23:32:08 +01:00
feat: complete development environment setup and code quality improvements
- Set up pre-commit hooks with husky and lint-staged for automated code quality - Improved TypeScript type safety by replacing 'any' types with proper generics - Fixed markdown linting violations (MD030 spacing) across all documentation - Fixed compound adjective hyphenation in technical documentation - Fixed invalid JSON union syntax in API documentation examples - Automated code formatting and linting on commit - Enhanced error handling with better type constraints - Configured biome and markdownlint for consistent code style - All changes verified with successful production build
This commit is contained in:
@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ This document outlines the database query optimizations implemented to improve t
|
||||
|
||||
The batch processing system was optimized to reduce database load and improve response times through several key strategies:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Database Index Optimization**
|
||||
2. **Query Pattern Improvements**
|
||||
3. **Company Caching**
|
||||
4. **Batch Operations**
|
||||
5. **Integration Layer with Fallback**
|
||||
1. **Database Index Optimization**
|
||||
2. **Query Pattern Improvements**
|
||||
3. **Company Caching**
|
||||
4. **Batch Operations**
|
||||
5. **Integration Layer with Fallback**
|
||||
|
||||
## Database Index Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
@ -32,15 +32,17 @@ The following composite indexes were added to the `AIProcessingRequest` table in
|
||||
### Query Performance Impact
|
||||
|
||||
These indexes specifically optimize:
|
||||
- Finding pending requests by status and creation time
|
||||
- Batch-related lookups by batch ID
|
||||
- Combined status and batch filtering operations
|
||||
|
||||
- Finding pending requests by status and creation time
|
||||
- Batch-related lookups by batch ID
|
||||
- Combined status and batch filtering operations
|
||||
|
||||
## Query Optimization Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Selective Data Fetching
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:**
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Loaded full session with all messages
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ include: {
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After:**
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Only essential data with message count
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
@ -86,6 +89,7 @@ class CompanyCache {
|
||||
### 3. Batch Operations
|
||||
|
||||
**Before:** N+1 queries for each company
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Sequential processing per company
|
||||
for (const company of companies) {
|
||||
@ -95,6 +99,7 @@ for (const company of companies) {
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After:** Single query for all companies
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Batch query for all companies at once
|
||||
const allRequests = await prisma.aIProcessingRequest.findMany({
|
||||
@ -114,10 +119,10 @@ const requestsByCompany = groupByCompany(allRequests);
|
||||
|
||||
### Query Count Reduction
|
||||
|
||||
- **Company lookups:** Reduced from 4 separate queries per scheduler run to 1 cached lookup
|
||||
- **Pending requests:** Reduced from N queries (one per company) to 1 batch query
|
||||
- **Status checks:** Reduced from N queries to 1 batch query
|
||||
- **Failed requests:** Reduced from N queries to 1 batch query
|
||||
- **Company lookups:** Reduced from 4 separate queries per scheduler run to 1 cached lookup
|
||||
- **Pending requests:** Reduced from N queries (one per company) to 1 batch query
|
||||
- **Status checks:** Reduced from N queries to 1 batch query
|
||||
- **Failed requests:** Reduced from N queries to 1 batch query
|
||||
|
||||
### Parallel Processing
|
||||
|
||||
@ -133,9 +138,9 @@ const SCHEDULER_CONFIG = {
|
||||
|
||||
### Memory Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
- Eliminated loading unnecessary message content
|
||||
- Used `select` instead of `include` where possible
|
||||
- Implemented automatic cache cleanup
|
||||
- Eliminated loading unnecessary message content
|
||||
- Used `select` instead of `include` where possible
|
||||
- Implemented automatic cache cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Layer
|
||||
|
||||
@ -169,45 +174,47 @@ class PerformanceTracker {
|
||||
## Files Modified
|
||||
|
||||
### New Files
|
||||
- `lib/batchProcessorOptimized.ts` - Optimized query implementations
|
||||
- `lib/batchSchedulerOptimized.ts` - Optimized scheduler
|
||||
- `lib/batchProcessorIntegration.ts` - Integration layer with fallback
|
||||
|
||||
- `lib/batchProcessorOptimized.ts` - Optimized query implementations
|
||||
- `lib/batchSchedulerOptimized.ts` - Optimized scheduler
|
||||
- `lib/batchProcessorIntegration.ts` - Integration layer with fallback
|
||||
|
||||
### Modified Files
|
||||
- `prisma/schema.prisma` - Added composite indexes
|
||||
- `server.ts` - Updated to use integration layer
|
||||
- `app/api/admin/batch-monitoring/route.ts` - Updated import
|
||||
|
||||
- `prisma/schema.prisma` - Added composite indexes
|
||||
- `server.ts` - Updated to use integration layer
|
||||
- `app/api/admin/batch-monitoring/route.ts` - Updated import
|
||||
|
||||
## Monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
The optimizations include comprehensive logging and monitoring:
|
||||
|
||||
- Performance metrics for each operation type
|
||||
- Cache hit/miss statistics
|
||||
- Fallback events tracking
|
||||
- Query execution time monitoring
|
||||
- Performance metrics for each operation type
|
||||
- Cache hit/miss statistics
|
||||
- Fallback events tracking
|
||||
- Query execution time monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
## Rollback Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
The integration layer allows for easy rollback:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set `ENABLE_BATCH_OPTIMIZATION=false`
|
||||
2. System automatically uses original implementation
|
||||
3. No database schema changes needed for rollback
|
||||
4. Indexes remain beneficial for manual queries
|
||||
1. Set `ENABLE_BATCH_OPTIMIZATION=false`
|
||||
2. System automatically uses original implementation
|
||||
3. No database schema changes needed for rollback
|
||||
4. Indexes remain beneficial for manual queries
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Performance Gains
|
||||
|
||||
- **Database Query Count:** 60-80% reduction in scheduler operations
|
||||
- **Memory Usage:** 40-60% reduction from selective data loading
|
||||
- **Response Time:** 30-50% improvement for batch operations
|
||||
- **Cache Hit Rate:** 95%+ for company lookups after warmup
|
||||
- **Database Query Count:** 60-80% reduction in scheduler operations
|
||||
- **Memory Usage:** 40-60% reduction from selective data loading
|
||||
- **Response Time:** 30-50% improvement for batch operations
|
||||
- **Cache Hit Rate:** 95%+ for company lookups after warmup
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Performance improvements can be validated by:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Monitoring the batch monitoring dashboard
|
||||
2. Checking performance metrics in logs
|
||||
3. Comparing execution times before/after optimization
|
||||
4. Load testing with multiple companies and large batches
|
||||
1. Monitoring the batch monitoring dashboard
|
||||
2. Checking performance metrics in logs
|
||||
3. Comparing execution times before/after optimization
|
||||
4. Load testing with multiple companies and large batches
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user